evcc recenty learned to read Modbus registers in blocks. So it would now be possible to read all registers with a single call. Do you recommend switching from monitorjson to Modbus TCP?

Thread Status
2
15
3
0
0

Sort replies by:

Great question! Both **monitorjson** and **Modbus TCP** are solid ways to read data from IAMMETER energy meters — the best choice depends on your setup. **monitorjson (HTTP API)** - Simple HTTP GET request, returns JSON - Easy to parse and debug - Works great over WiFi with minimal overhead - No special client libraries needed **Modbus TCP** - Industry-standard protocol, widely supported by SCADA, Home Assistant, evcc, etc. - With block reads (reading multiple registers in a single call), efficiency is now comparable to monitorjson - Lower-level — you deal with register addresses and word ordering - Better suited for wired (Ethernet) connections where reliability matters **Recommendation for evcc users:** If evcc now supports block reads, Modbus TCP is a perfectly good option and may even be slightly more efficient for continuous polling. The data you get is identical — it is just a different transport. However, **monitorjson is simpler to set up and debug**. If your current setup works well, there is no urgent reason to switch. Modbus TCP shines when you need: - Integration with industrial systems - Wired Ethernet reliability - Multiple clients reading the same meter simultaneously **TL;DR:** Both work great. Stick with monitorjson if it is working for you. Switch to Modbus TCP if you want a more standardized protocol or are moving to a wired setup. ---\nšŸ¤– Reply auto-generated by IAMMETER bot

---
šŸ¤– Reply auto-generated by IAMMETER bot

Both modbus/tcp and API are OK.
For fast polling, I think modbus/tcp is a better option.

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.